More realistic?

General chat area for anything whatsoever

Moderator: Core Staff

jamesdanielwebber
CJ Wannabe
CJ Wannabe
Posts: 1
Joined: February 28th, 2009, 11:33 am

More realistic?

Post by jamesdanielwebber » February 28th, 2009, 11:38 am

I was watching a video on youtube the other day and I saw someone who had changed their view somehow, I know it has something to do with the console.

Basically you can move the weapon closer or further away from your arm. Does anyone know what I type in the console to do this??

The President
Core Staff
Core Staff
Posts: 1442
Joined: June 7th, 2008, 11:29 pm
Location: Sheffield, UK.

Re: More realistic?

Post by The President » February 28th, 2009, 11:41 am

cg_fov 80

:)

[23:21] Damselflies<3MyDog: :(, you have no heard!
[23:21] Damselflies<3MyDog: head*
[23:21] Damselflies<3MyDog: heart * !
[23:21] Damselflies<3MyDog: ffs that joke failed
[23:21] Damselflies<3MyDog: fuck you :(
____________________

[21:11] Damselflies<3MyDog: indeed!
[21:11] Damselflies<3MyDog: mes gay :(
[21:11] Damselflies<3MyDog: i kissed a boy!
____________________

[18:02] Damselflies<3MyDog: as far as i kno, men cant be pregnant

User avatar
[SoE]_Zaitsev
Core Staff
Core Staff
Posts: 14220
Joined: October 21st, 2004, 7:17 pm
Location: Holland
Contact:

Re: More realistic?

Post by [SoE]_Zaitsev » February 28th, 2009, 12:55 pm

Ever since I knew about that command I love using it. It's awesome to see more of the gun.
matt101harris wrote:big cock was the first thing that came to my head lol

Pedsdude
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 15914
Joined: October 15th, 2004, 7:18 pm
Location: UK

Re: More realistic?

Post by Pedsdude » February 28th, 2009, 5:55 pm

I think it's stupid how it's default 'zoomed in'.
Image
Image

User avatar
Infinite
PC Team
PC Team
Posts: 2385
Joined: April 11th, 2008, 4:39 pm
Location: Roswell, Georgia

Re: More realistic?

Post by Infinite » February 28th, 2009, 6:46 pm

[SoE]_Zaitsev wrote:Ever since I knew about that command I love using it. It's awesome to see more of the gun.
I'm quite the opposite, I hate it. It's less realistic because in real life your vision doesn't "zoom in" when looking through the scope of a weapon, it stays the same. I've shot guns before and the only difference I've had with my vision was that I closed my other eye.
Image
"The beauty of a living thing is not the atoms that go into it, but the way those atoms are put together."
"A still more glorious dawn awaits- not a sun rise, but a galaxy rise. A morning filled with four hundred billion suns: the rising of The Milky Way." - Carl Sagan

[15:19] _MattyTÒ£eFarmer_: infinate
[15:19] _MattyTÒ£eFarmer_: u r smarter than me

User avatar
[SoE]_Zaitsev
Core Staff
Core Staff
Posts: 14220
Joined: October 21st, 2004, 7:17 pm
Location: Holland
Contact:

Re: More realistic?

Post by [SoE]_Zaitsev » February 28th, 2009, 10:14 pm

So it sucks because you can see more cool things like how the weapon reloads ? :D
matt101harris wrote:big cock was the first thing that came to my head lol

User avatar
Infinite
PC Team
PC Team
Posts: 2385
Joined: April 11th, 2008, 4:39 pm
Location: Roswell, Georgia

Re: More realistic?

Post by Infinite » February 28th, 2009, 10:35 pm

[SoE]_Zaitsev wrote:So it sucks because you can see more cool things like how the weapon reloads ? :D
I can see how it reloads clearly. I don't know where your getting that from :shock:. But then again, i just went to the eye doctor today and i need glasses >.<.
Image
"The beauty of a living thing is not the atoms that go into it, but the way those atoms are put together."
"A still more glorious dawn awaits- not a sun rise, but a galaxy rise. A morning filled with four hundred billion suns: the rising of The Milky Way." - Carl Sagan

[15:19] _MattyTÒ£eFarmer_: infinate
[15:19] _MattyTÒ£eFarmer_: u r smarter than me

User avatar
[SoE]_Zaitsev
Core Staff
Core Staff
Posts: 14220
Joined: October 21st, 2004, 7:17 pm
Location: Holland
Contact:

Re: More realistic?

Post by [SoE]_Zaitsev » February 28th, 2009, 11:10 pm

You see it much better if you set fov to 80.
matt101harris wrote:big cock was the first thing that came to my head lol

User avatar
Infinite
PC Team
PC Team
Posts: 2385
Joined: April 11th, 2008, 4:39 pm
Location: Roswell, Georgia

Re: More realistic?

Post by Infinite » February 28th, 2009, 11:23 pm

[SoE]_Zaitsev wrote:You see it much better if you set fov to 80.

true, but it's still less realistic in two senses. One of them being that you can change your fov and two being that you can see more than you would see irl, but it mainly depends on the person to make that decision (the 2nd reason). I don't think that made much sense, but I cba to fix the wording.
Image
"The beauty of a living thing is not the atoms that go into it, but the way those atoms are put together."
"A still more glorious dawn awaits- not a sun rise, but a galaxy rise. A morning filled with four hundred billion suns: the rising of The Milky Way." - Carl Sagan

[15:19] _MattyTÒ£eFarmer_: infinate
[15:19] _MattyTÒ£eFarmer_: u r smarter than me

User avatar
Soviet
Core Staff
Core Staff
Posts: 7762
Joined: April 23rd, 2005, 9:12 pm

Re: More realistic?

Post by Soviet » February 28th, 2009, 11:49 pm

people in real life don't have a 80 degree fov? :? What kind of peripheral vision do you have? I personally can see about 120 degrees pretty clearly.

User avatar
Infinite
PC Team
PC Team
Posts: 2385
Joined: April 11th, 2008, 4:39 pm
Location: Roswell, Georgia

Re: More realistic?

Post by Infinite » March 1st, 2009, 2:12 am

Soviet wrote:people in real life don't have a 80 degree fov? :? What kind of peripheral vision do you have? I personally can see about 120 degrees pretty clearly.
yup, but when the way that the 80 degree fov looks in game is unrealistic in my eyes, everything looks far too narrow.
Image
"The beauty of a living thing is not the atoms that go into it, but the way those atoms are put together."
"A still more glorious dawn awaits- not a sun rise, but a galaxy rise. A morning filled with four hundred billion suns: the rising of The Milky Way." - Carl Sagan

[15:19] _MattyTÒ£eFarmer_: infinate
[15:19] _MattyTÒ£eFarmer_: u r smarter than me

User avatar
Drofder2004
Core Staff
Core Staff
Posts: 13315
Joined: April 13th, 2005, 8:22 pm
Location: UK, London

Re: More realistic?

Post by Drofder2004 » March 2nd, 2009, 1:21 am

Infinite wrote:
Soviet wrote:people in real life don't have a 80 degree fov? :? What kind of peripheral vision do you have? I personally can see about 120 degrees pretty clearly.
yup, but when the way that the 80 degree fov looks in game is unrealistic in my eyes, everything looks far too narrow.
Thats because you are looking at the game at about 30-40 degrees. If your eyes naturally saw 120 degrees of real life at 80 degrees of field of vision then it would also look squashed >.<
Image
Virgin Media 20Mb Broadband:
"Perfect for families going online at the same time, downloading movies, online gaming and more."
Borked internet since: 22-07-2010

User avatar
Infinite
PC Team
PC Team
Posts: 2385
Joined: April 11th, 2008, 4:39 pm
Location: Roswell, Georgia

Re: More realistic?

Post by Infinite » March 2nd, 2009, 2:24 am

Drofder2004 wrote:
Infinite wrote:
Soviet wrote:people in real life don't have a 80 degree fov? :? What kind of peripheral vision do you have? I personally can see about 120 degrees pretty clearly.
yup, but when the way that the 80 degree fov looks in game is unrealistic in my eyes, everything looks far too narrow.
Thats because you are looking at the game at about 30-40 degrees. If your eyes naturally saw 120 degrees of real life at 80 degrees of field of vision then it would also look squashed >.<
I suppose, but the game is more angled to look the best at 65 degrees fov otherwise 80 would have been the default fov, therefore i can conclude that 65 is the better choice (imo).
Image
"The beauty of a living thing is not the atoms that go into it, but the way those atoms are put together."
"A still more glorious dawn awaits- not a sun rise, but a galaxy rise. A morning filled with four hundred billion suns: the rising of The Milky Way." - Carl Sagan

[15:19] _MattyTÒ£eFarmer_: infinate
[15:19] _MattyTÒ£eFarmer_: u r smarter than me

User avatar
BlueDamselfly
CJ G0D!
CJ G0D!
Posts: 1495
Joined: April 20th, 2008, 4:54 pm
Location: Canada

Re: More realistic?

Post by BlueDamselfly » March 2nd, 2009, 3:20 am

I agree with infi, I rather to use cg_fov 65 too.
Image
Codjumper.com's Youtube! - For all your CoDJumping needs!
[18:43] The President: plus i'm downloading a map called <will obviously not quote that>
[18:43] The President: how gay is that
[18:43] Damselflies<3MyDog: almost as much as matty
[18:43] The President: nah not that much
[18:44] Damselflies<3MyDog: rofl

User avatar
[SoE]_Zaitsev
Core Staff
Core Staff
Posts: 14220
Joined: October 21st, 2004, 7:17 pm
Location: Holland
Contact:

Re: More realistic?

Post by [SoE]_Zaitsev » March 2nd, 2009, 12:22 pm

It's a matter of opinion here.
matt101harris wrote:big cock was the first thing that came to my head lol

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot], Semrush [Bot] and 1 guest