World Wide Web

General chat area for anything whatsoever

Moderator: Core Staff

JeffStewart
CJ Wannabe
CJ Wannabe
Posts: 1
Joined: December 29th, 2007, 8:23 am
Location: usa
Contact:

World Wide Web

Post by JeffStewart » December 29th, 2007, 8:42 am

<removed>

JDogg
Too cool for CoDJumper
Too cool for CoDJumper
Posts: 3617
Joined: August 28th, 2007, 11:46 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Post by JDogg » December 29th, 2007, 9:30 am

Why am I the one who always finds spam first?
Image
Image

steveuk
CJ G0D!
CJ G0D!
Posts: 1330
Joined: November 21st, 2006, 12:51 pm

Post by steveuk » December 29th, 2007, 10:22 am

JDogg wrote:Why am I the one who always finds spam first?
Wrong i found A Link to Child /Young Porn link on here the other morning, and told admin to remove it ASAP, befor someone reported it and may of got this cool Site got closed down...only person i saw online when i left a message was Nightmare, maybe he did the right thing and deleted it straight away, but whoever deleted the link with pictures did a good job or removeing it within the hour of my compiant.

Steve

JDogg
Too cool for CoDJumper
Too cool for CoDJumper
Posts: 3617
Joined: August 28th, 2007, 11:46 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Post by JDogg » December 29th, 2007, 10:40 am

steveuk wrote:
JDogg wrote:Why am I the one who always finds spam first?
Wrong i found A Link to Child /Young Porn link on here the other morning, and told admin to remove it ASAP, befor someone reported it and may of got this cool Site got closed down...only person i saw online when i left a message was Nightmare, maybe he did the right thing and deleted it straight away, but whoever deleted the link with pictures did a good job or removeing it within the hour of my compiant.

Steve
Good job, no one wants to see that sick shit. I think its time for this site to become spam free... Somehow, maybe make a simple english test like. Write the word Hello, to get rid of bots. Also I think a new comers first 3-4 posts should be monitored, and the admin/moderator should give the ok before it can be seen publicly
Image
Image

User avatar
Cpt.Cool
CJ Worshipper
CJ Worshipper
Posts: 204
Joined: May 31st, 2007, 2:27 am
Contact:

Post by Cpt.Cool » December 29th, 2007, 2:54 pm

bots are pervs
Image
Image
YaNo wrote:I use Cool as my UO compiler :) Try it, it works!

JDogg
Too cool for CoDJumper
Too cool for CoDJumper
Posts: 3617
Joined: August 28th, 2007, 11:46 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Post by JDogg » December 29th, 2007, 3:28 pm

Cpt.Cool wrote:bots are pervs
Who's a perv?
Image
Image

User avatar
Drofder2004
Core Staff
Core Staff
Posts: 13315
Joined: April 13th, 2005, 8:22 pm
Location: UK, London

Post by Drofder2004 » December 29th, 2007, 3:31 pm

You sure it was "child" and not just "young", I have yet to see a bot post anything illegal, it is not in their interest to do so.
Can the admin who deleted it, confirm or not, because if that sort of material IS getting through, then Peds seriously does have to step up the anti spam.
Image
Virgin Media 20Mb Broadband:
"Perfect for families going online at the same time, downloading movies, online gaming and more."
Borked internet since: 22-07-2010

JDogg
Too cool for CoDJumper
Too cool for CoDJumper
Posts: 3617
Joined: August 28th, 2007, 11:46 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Post by JDogg » December 29th, 2007, 3:32 pm

Drofder2004 wrote:You sure it was "child" and not just "young", I have yet to see a bot post anything illegal, it is not in their interest to do so.
Can the admin who deleted it, confirm or not, because if that sort of material IS getting through, then Peds seriously does have to step up the anti spam.
My idea is good :)
Image
Image

User avatar
Drofder2004
Core Staff
Core Staff
Posts: 13315
Joined: April 13th, 2005, 8:22 pm
Location: UK, London

Post by Drofder2004 » December 29th, 2007, 3:37 pm

JDogg wrote:
Drofder2004 wrote:You sure it was "child" and not just "young", I have yet to see a bot post anything illegal, it is not in their interest to do so.
Can the admin who deleted it, confirm or not, because if that sort of material IS getting through, then Peds seriously does have to step up the anti spam.
My idea is good :)
Registration I believe already has a "CAPTCHA", but even nowadays, bots can get passed these images using specialised software to recognise patterns in letters.

The idea of monitoring first post(s) has been suggested in the private area in the passed, but would be no different than already available.

My idea, is (if possible by addon), is to disallow the users first post to contain BBCODE, images and links. This way, all we get is text.
Image
Virgin Media 20Mb Broadband:
"Perfect for families going online at the same time, downloading movies, online gaming and more."
Borked internet since: 22-07-2010

JDogg
Too cool for CoDJumper
Too cool for CoDJumper
Posts: 3617
Joined: August 28th, 2007, 11:46 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Post by JDogg » December 29th, 2007, 3:40 pm

Drofder2004 wrote:
JDogg wrote:
Drofder2004 wrote:You sure it was "child" and not just "young", I have yet to see a bot post anything illegal, it is not in their interest to do so.
Can the admin who deleted it, confirm or not, because if that sort of material IS getting through, then Peds seriously does have to step up the anti spam.
My idea is good :)
Registration I believe already has a "CAPTCHA", but even nowadays, bots can get passed these images using specialised software to recognise patterns in letters.

The idea of monitoring first post(s) has been suggested in the private area in the passed, but would be no different than already available.

My idea, is (if possible by addon), is to disallow the users first post to contain BBCODE, images and links. This way, all we get is text.
That is a good idea, also if the text contains http:// or .com etc it isn't shown
Image
Image

User avatar
Soviet
Core Staff
Core Staff
Posts: 7762
Joined: April 23rd, 2005, 9:12 pm

Post by Soviet » December 29th, 2007, 6:42 pm

JDogg wrote:Why am I the one who always finds spam first?
you're not. I think most of the active cj members find 1 to 2 topics a day, sometimes I get as many as five that I delete. We're just so efficient you don't even know they're there :wink:

Pedsdude
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 15914
Joined: October 15th, 2004, 7:18 pm
Location: UK

Post by Pedsdude » December 29th, 2007, 6:43 pm

Precisely, it's a team effort! :)
Image
Image

JDogg
Too cool for CoDJumper
Too cool for CoDJumper
Posts: 3617
Joined: August 28th, 2007, 11:46 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Post by JDogg » December 30th, 2007, 1:06 am

Soviet wrote:
JDogg wrote:Why am I the one who always finds spam first?
you're not. I think most of the active cj members find 1 to 2 topics a day, sometimes I get as many as five that I delete. We're just so efficient you don't even know they're there :wink:
Yeah, I was going to say, how can I tell if I'm first to spot them if they aren't there?
Image
Image

steveuk
CJ G0D!
CJ G0D!
Posts: 1330
Joined: November 21st, 2006, 12:51 pm

Post by steveuk » December 30th, 2007, 2:52 am

Drofder2004 wrote:You sure it was "child" and not just "young", I have yet to see a bot post anything illegal, it is not in their interest to do so.
Can the admin who deleted it, confirm or not, because if that sort of material IS getting through, then Peds seriously does have to step up the anti spam.
Im prety sure it was Child porn they was not adults, and as soon as i clicked the thread to open ya could see they was kids, i didnt even know it was this kinda sick shit untill thread opened as it had a differnt topic name.

I gota keep checking my forum every week, i locked the welcome so no posts can be made apart from my own, and all folders & Threads are only viewed by new member registrations... Talking about my forum, i best go check it as ive not checked it for a few days..lol

Steve

User avatar
Marshall
CJ Spammer!
CJ Spammer!
Posts: 820
Joined: December 10th, 2005, 11:28 am
Location: UK

Post by Marshall » December 30th, 2007, 3:04 am

Delete the thread and forget about it?

Instead of giving googlebot the benefit of the doubt.

young porn

child porn

kids

:? :shock: :o :x :evil: :shock: :? :x :evil: :oops: :? :o

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot] and 2 guests