cod1 crouch jumping in gap records issue

Chat area specifically for CoDJumper

Moderator: Core Staff

should crouch jumping in gap records be banned?

yes
11
55%
no
9
45%
 
Total votes: 20

De$t!ny
Past/Inactive Team Member
Past/Inactive Team Member
Posts: 374
Joined: November 11th, 2004, 8:24 pm

cod1 crouch jumping in gap records issue

Post by De$t!ny » February 15th, 2006, 1:00 am

someone has been complaining to me saying you can use 333fps in jm_motion and ultra_gap_training if you crouch jump and thinks it gives an advantage...watch the sylence260 demo(although don't know if hes using 333fps). i didn't think 333fps gave any advantage in jumping which is why there is no rule about it for cod1. but it is hard to prove 100% that 333fps doesn't allow you to jump further than 125fps, and everyone makes gap records in jm_motion or ultra_gap_training with the ceiling purposely low so you can't use 333fps without crouch jumping. so to make things totally fair, i could add a rule of no crouch jumping which will also mean you can record in cj_gap_training...what do you guys think?
Image

User avatar
woCooM
Past/Inactive Team Member
Past/Inactive Team Member
Posts: 886
Joined: November 2nd, 2004, 6:06 pm
PSN ID: Sanctifico
Location: I.I.T.Y.I.W.H.T.K.Y! <work it out!
Contact:

Post by woCooM » February 15th, 2006, 1:52 am

i tried 333fps with crouch jumping etc. and i couldent see a diffrence ant.

personally i agree with lukes theory on this, you can get higher but overall distance is the same if not less
Image
Some People Look Back on WWII, I LIVE IT!
Для Матb россия!
Image

Luke
Past/Inactive Team Member
Past/Inactive Team Member
Posts: 1774
Joined: May 31st, 2005, 12:42 am
Location: Cornwall, UK

Post by Luke » February 15th, 2006, 3:11 am

I've tried it out on motion and ultra_gap_training with 333 and the best i got with crouch jumping was like 248 or something. This sylence guy told me he used 125fps and crouch jumped 260 :roll: can't be possible, and i know he used above 125 coz when i spectated him i told him to stop crouching and it was obvious then

User avatar
-venom-
CJ Worshipper
CJ Worshipper
Posts: 333
Joined: May 9th, 2005, 7:02 pm
Location: USA

Post by -venom- » February 15th, 2006, 3:16 am

if crouch jumping gives an unfair advantage it should be banned
x-fire: word13
Image

User avatar
aicaramba
Past/Inactive Team Member
Past/Inactive Team Member
Posts: 2720
Joined: May 31st, 2005, 3:45 pm
Location: zeeland (N-Br), Holland

Post by aicaramba » February 15th, 2006, 6:45 am

Who says they got 333 fps...
Perhaps more, maybe seems unlikely but who knows.
i told him to stop crouching and it was obvious then
Did he hit the ceiling or what? if he did hit the ceiling than crouchjumps should be banned.
P.S.V. Kampioen!

User avatar
Ownia
Past/Inactive Team Member
Past/Inactive Team Member
Posts: 1117
Joined: November 11th, 2004, 4:24 pm
Location: Tallinn/Estonia
Contact:

Post by Ownia » February 15th, 2006, 1:40 pm

Well if luke couldnt do it with 333 then it needs a lot of skill so i voted no
Image

Inferiority of the voice inside made me turn my back on...

Image


Image

Luke
Past/Inactive Team Member
Past/Inactive Team Member
Posts: 1774
Joined: May 31st, 2005, 12:42 am
Location: Cornwall, UK

Post by Luke » February 15th, 2006, 2:17 pm

Did he hit the ceiling or what? if he did hit the ceiling than crouchjumps should be banned.
Yes, he didn't get close when he didn't use crouch, because he was using above 125fps, but i dont know if he used 333, maybe more coz me and destiny have tried it with 333 and dont get close. so i voted yes to ban crouch jumping in gap records.

!Zaitsev!
Past/Inactive Team Member
Past/Inactive Team Member
Posts: 219
Joined: November 3rd, 2004, 8:11 pm
Location: Germany
Contact:

Post by !Zaitsev! » February 15th, 2006, 2:54 pm

I also think its like 400-900 Fps :roll: or maybe more :?: :!:
should be banned !
Image

User avatar
aicaramba
Past/Inactive Team Member
Past/Inactive Team Member
Posts: 2720
Joined: May 31st, 2005, 3:45 pm
Location: zeeland (N-Br), Holland

Post by aicaramba » February 15th, 2006, 5:18 pm

Ive said this in the other thread..
But ive heard of jumpers making 268 with crouchjump..
If that is the case.. then crouchjump will be to big of an advantage over non crouchjumps..
if we keep no crouch jumping with 125fps, we have a soid standard, there can be no uncertanty.
This is a good point aswell imo :roll:
P.S.V. Kampioen!

Pedsdude
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 15914
Joined: October 15th, 2004, 7:18 pm
Location: UK

Post by Pedsdude » February 15th, 2006, 6:01 pm

I voted no, although I'm not particularly bothered seeing:

1. I can't get past 125fps
2. I can't jump anywhere near 260 :P
Image
Image

!Zaitsev!
Past/Inactive Team Member
Past/Inactive Team Member
Posts: 219
Joined: November 3rd, 2004, 8:11 pm
Location: Germany
Contact:

Post by !Zaitsev! » February 15th, 2006, 6:18 pm

Peds..... omg thats not fair..... if you didn't saw the demo you can't vote no :?
it is so clear... if anyone do a crouch jump he is touching the ceiling by jumping normal :!:
@ all ...1st look the demo of sylence then vote :roll: and see his lazy jumping :?
Image

Lisa
CJ Worshipper
CJ Worshipper
Posts: 442
Joined: December 24th, 2005, 1:22 am
Location: US of A

Post by Lisa » February 15th, 2006, 6:35 pm

Pedsdude wrote:I voted no, although I'm not particularly bothered seeing:

1. I can't get past 125fps
2. I can't jump anywhere near 260 :P
I'm with you on this one...except I can't get anywhere near 231 :? :oops: But I am going to vote yes because I think there needs to be a standard set where everyone is on equal terms.
Image
~Materazzi~
Image

User avatar
Drofder2004
Core Staff
Core Staff
Posts: 13315
Joined: April 13th, 2005, 8:22 pm
Location: UK, London

Post by Drofder2004 » February 15th, 2006, 11:36 pm

New rules?
-Anyone outside of UK is auto banned
-Anyone who uses an fps not exactly equal to 52.
-Anyone using their left hand for muse actions is banned.
-Anyone using arrow keys is banned.
-Strafing is banned.

Who cares imo, just ban anyone who has an ego bigger than their popularity.
(/ban self)
Image
Virgin Media 20Mb Broadband:
"Perfect for families going online at the same time, downloading movies, online gaming and more."
Borked internet since: 22-07-2010

Luke
Past/Inactive Team Member
Past/Inactive Team Member
Posts: 1774
Joined: May 31st, 2005, 12:42 am
Location: Cornwall, UK

Post by Luke » February 15th, 2006, 11:53 pm

tbh it wouldn't bother me if someone jumped 270 and i was in last place, but we do have a gap records page, and we do have people that want to compete and care about it, and it would be pretty lame if there were no rules, coz unfortunately there are a few that would abuse it. you've gotta give credit where its due, not to fake cheaters...i don't like all this fuss but i guess it needs to be sorted.

User avatar
Drofder2004
Core Staff
Core Staff
Posts: 13315
Joined: April 13th, 2005, 8:22 pm
Location: UK, London

Post by Drofder2004 » February 16th, 2006, 1:33 pm

Luke wrote:tbh it wouldn't bother me if someone jumped 270 and i was in last place, but we do have a gap records page, and we do have people that want to compete and care about it, and it would be pretty lame if there were no rules, coz unfortunately there are a few that would abuse it. you've gotta give credit where its due, not to fake cheaters...i don't like all this fuss but i guess it needs to be sorted.
I hate to say it but I dont think there is a way of stopping cheaters.

Unless there was a mod that EVERYONE had to use to record their gap jumps. The mod would have to regulate all cvars, stop people crouching, stop 333 fps. (Its possible, but imo, not worth it.)
Image
Virgin Media 20Mb Broadband:
"Perfect for families going online at the same time, downloading movies, online gaming and more."
Borked internet since: 22-07-2010

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 0 guests