lucky mapmonkeys guys


Moderator: Core Staff
The mapMonkeys crew are pro-glitchers
matt101harris wrote:big cock was the first thing that came to my head lol
Indeed, no need to shit on their parade just because we're jealousKillerSam wrote:It would be a terrible idea to do that in my opinionmatt101harris wrote:u want me to comment on their facebook and say something about codjumper?
Oh right, I didn't know it console they tested it on. I look forward to seeing what jumps are available which they may have missed for not being able to jump so far.aicaramba wrote:But we dont earn money doing them... They do, thats the difference.
Its stupid to let them test the game on console and not on pc, even IW should realise that.
Personally, it's not that I think we're better... it's that I think they're worse. Charging money to watch a video of a game which they do not own is blasphemy. Not to mention that (somewhere in this thread?) I've heard that they steal videos and charge money for them. It's just an unspeakable crime to me, but that's just how I see it. It's good that IW actually brought in people that will help them to make MW2 a better game, but what I disagree with is their choice of whom to bring in (even if they've had past experience with beta testing, which is a +). I'm not specifically pointing out anybody in CJ that should've been chosen, but I would've liked to have seen a better group to have gone.Pedsdude wrote:Indeed, no need to shit on their parade just because we're jealousKillerSam wrote:It would be a terrible idea to do that in my opinionmatt101harris wrote:u want me to comment on their facebook and say something about codjumper?I'm pleased for them and would like to think that had it been the other way round they would be pleased for us and not bitching and posting about how they think they're better than us..
matt101harris wrote:big cock was the first thing that came to my head lol
The fact is they are actually bigger, but there is a good reason for it.Infinite wrote:Personally, it's not that I think we're better... it's that I think they're worse. Charging money to watch a video of a game which they do not own is blasphemy. Not to mention that (somewhere in this thread?) I've heard that they steal videos and charge money for them. It's just an unspeakable crime to me, but that's just how I see it. It's good that IW actually brought in people that will help them to make MW2 a better game, but what I disagree with is their choice of whom to bring in (even if they've had past experience with beta testing, which is a +). I'm not specifically pointing out anybody in CJ that should've been chosen, but I would've liked to have seen a better group to have gone.
Put yourself in IW's shoes, though - they're not going to care about the ethics of the group they choose. All they're care about is bottom-line profits, and in order to get higher profits they're gonna cut costs directly (get people from the US) and indirectly (get people who are more familiar with beta testing games).Infinite wrote:Personally, it's not that I think we're better... it's that I think they're worse. Charging money to watch a video of a game which they do not own is blasphemy. Not to mention that (somewhere in this thread?) I've heard that they steal videos and charge money for them. It's just an unspeakable crime to me, but that's just how I see it. It's good that IW actually brought in people that will help them to make MW2 a better game, but what I disagree with is their choice of whom to bring in (even if they've had past experience with beta testing, which is a +).
Indeed, we need to emphasise what we already know - we're the biggest CoD jumping community, and that they're probably better off chosing us in future if they want to remove exploitative jumps from the game before release.Drofder2004 wrote:I think we need to start stamping our names and logos all over stuff and present IW with a package simply entitled "What they missed."
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Semrush [Bot] and 1 guest