addicted to gaming !

EmperoR · Post by **EmperoR** » June 13th, 2007, 10:37 am

http://www.xfire.com/profile/busfahrer/

look at this guy

he played 8600 hours of css >.< never seen so much hours if anyone can find more show here

Neon · Post by **Neon** » June 13th, 2007, 12:16 pm

If he's not amazing at CS then shame on him....

Post by **waywaaaard** » June 13th, 2007, 12:19 pm

maybe he is only spec?

Post by **Soviet** » June 13th, 2007, 7:42 pm

and on 1.6....shame on him for enduring those shitty graphics

Neon · Post by **Neon** » June 13th, 2007, 7:52 pm

Soviet wrote:and on 1.6....shame on him for enduring those shitty graphics

but the gameplay makes up for it

Post by **Soviet** » June 13th, 2007, 9:36 pm

gameplay, what gameplay? the headshots are impossible to get (which ruins the point of a headshot and everything it stands for), the sound defeats realism in every possible way, it takes far too much to kill someone, and the aiming is even more unrealistic and stupid than source. Any game where your skill level depends on your ability to play within how the game's mechanics work to win has crappy gameplay.

just my opinion though

Neon · Post by **Neon** » June 13th, 2007, 10:56 pm

You can't get headshots on 1.6? It's eeeeeasy ;o You just don't move your mouse from headheight and bam...herpes. I think the aiming system is good, if you don't shoot in bursts or precision you'll be punished for it.

"Any game where your skill level depends on your ability to play within how the game's mechanics work to win has crappy gameplay"

What game doesn't have that? Look at CoD2, people with the highest scores normally boxshot or clip...

It's all opinions though ennit

Post by **waywaaaard** » June 14th, 2007, 11:25 am

1.6 is definitely better than source!
but 1.5 was better than 1.6

Post by **Pedsdude** » June 14th, 2007, 2:27 pm

Soviet wrote:gameplay, what gameplay? the headshots are impossible to get (which ruins the point of a headshot and everything it stands for), the sound defeats realism in every possible way, it takes far too much to kill someone, and the aiming is even more unrealistic and stupid than source. Any game where your skill level depends on your ability to play within how the game's mechanics work to win has crappy gameplay.

just my opinion though

Totally agree

8682 hours = just under a year
Sometimes I think these kind of people just leave their PC running to get the stats up, I wouldn't be surprised if he was. But then again, there are some people with mental issues out there!

Post by **Soviet** » June 14th, 2007, 8:47 pm

Neon wrote:You can't get headshots on 1.6? It's eeeeeasy ;o You just don't move your mouse from headheight and bam...herpes. I think the aiming system is good, if you don't shoot in bursts or precision you'll be punished for it.

"Any game where your skill level depends on your ability to play within how the game's mechanics work to win has crappy gameplay"

What game doesn't have that? Look at CoD2, people with the highest scores normally boxshot or clip...

It's all opinions though ennit

im not talking about exploiting the game or doing what we do best at codjumper.com. I'm talking about spending hours learning precisely how to jump crouch and aim with an awp so the person misses their shot and you get a headshot whereas normally the awp would wildly shoot at the ceiling for some unknown reason. In cod2 guns aim the way you expect them to. If you zoom in on a sniper rifle the scope moves. If the crosshair is over the enemy when you shoot they die. In cs this is not the case at all. You have to learn how to interpret your movement and its effect on your accuracy, where to point the gun to get an instantaneous headshot, and learn how to put up with the shitty graphics

Post by **Pedsdude** » June 14th, 2007, 9:39 pm

So, to conclude, CS SUCKS

Neon · Post by **Neon** » June 14th, 2007, 10:47 pm

I dunno I love it, but i'm okay at CS so I dunno. I've found on CoD2 that if you try aim for the player model you don't get as many kills, i've no idea what the hitbox is doing lol.

Post by **Pedsdude** » June 15th, 2007, 1:14 am

CoD2 is dodgy in some ways, yeah, but it's consistent. Whenever I play CS or CSS I always go for headshots, crouch and fire in short bursts at the head - sometimes it's an automatic headshot, most of the time NOTHING happens and it pisses me off. CoD1 and CoD2 are more consistent, which makes them much better imo (CoD1 particularly - I love the gameplay in it).

CoDJumper.com Movies · Post by **Nightmare** » June 15th, 2007, 1:23 am

What I find mostly bad about video games is that the accuracy is incorrect, if your aiming the gun, its going to go there unless you point somewhere else. This is really easy to see with the awp in css, you could be pointing the gun at someone and fire. The shot would just go at some random place not even near where the gun was being pointed at. I really wish the programmers could take this into account, the closest I have seen is Red Orchestra, where the shot goes where you point.

Neon · Post by **Neon** » June 15th, 2007, 1:54 am

Tagging in CoD2 just gets ridiculous...I can't stand it when I tag someone when it was definitely a shot at the torso or neck. I swear to god i've shot someone in the ehad and they were only tagged >.O

addicted to gaming !

addicted to gaming !

Who is online