CoDJumper.com

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-hMAu1NsswY

1:30, 1:36 and 1:41 are old

But nice to see you make a video that exactly makes sense
Good job.

Never seen any vid about those bounces

Only new spot are those 2 (1 ?) Pipeline trees. I like those the most. Kinda losing track of old/new bounces

They are like a year old Xpayne. But no1 ever cared to make a video of them since they are small and useless since the other way is much easier.

1st one is pointless, 3rd one is pointless, 5th is pointless, 9th/10th/11th are old(?)/pointless, 12th is pointless, 16th is old. That's all I feel safe about commenting on. Feel free to flame me, but that's my thoughts.

It aren't great jumps indeed but still better than a movie of old jumps, which we all seen 10000 times.
So i gotta say good job

Since when did we start rating jumps on if they were pointless or not?
75% of CoD1 jumps would be pointless >.>

I think there almost arent spots left to explore or otherwise almost impossible
and allot of these bounces are pretty hard

awesome 5/5

Very nice, I liked that video a lot, 5*

Drofder2004 wrote:Since when did we start rating jumps on if they were pointless or not?
75% of CoD1 jumps would be pointless >.>

By pointless, I mean that there are much easier ways to get to the spots that they get to, they don't require and RPG by going a different way, etc. That's how I rate jumps for the most part (whether I post it or not).

Well Infinity reading your Opinion i can say that all bounces is pointless...

Look at it this way:

Bounce 1: Easy bounce, can mostly do it in 1 try, requires no RPG

Bounce 2: Hard bounce, requires RPG jump to a slightly higher spot first, need to bounce a really hard target and also need to use RPG and FPS change to reach the exact same spot as the previous bounce.

What would you choose ?

I would choose both options.

CoDJumper isn't about finding new places, its about finding new routes to those places. No matter the difficulty, both ways are possible options.