New World Order

[aicaramba]

A dutch university watched loose change with a lot of critism (?) and found an other explination for every reason why the government wouldve done it.. Like the explosions prior to the collaps appearing under the collapsing part of hte building was caused by extreme pressures inside the building due to the building coming down.
I dont know every thing, but they came up with a logical explination that does not have to do with government blowing it up for every thing
The only thing i really believe that the goverment doesnt tell the complete story is the jfk murder.. And I mean the part of the bullet fleight (not in this movie)

[Neon]

A dutch university watched loose change with a lot of critism (?) and found an other explination for every reason why the government wouldve done it.. Like the explosions prior to the collaps appearing under the collapsing part of hte building was caused by extreme pressures inside the building due to the building coming down.
The only thing i really believe that the goverment doesnt tell the complete story is the jfk murder.. And I mean the part of the bullet fleight (not in this movie)

Yeah you can disprove some things from loose change. But it doesn't change the facts that bother towers and the other building's collapse defied physics.

Oswald may have fired some shots, but there definitly was atleast one other shooter in Houston.

[aicaramba]

They didnt disprove some things, they disproved everything in loose change.

[Neon]

No they havn't :S Have you watched the latest version of lose change? Engineers, scientists have all said that it couldn't have been jet fuel. I'd like to know what your evidence to disprove it is.

[aicaramba]

I have nothing to disprove it, I havent even seen loose change. All I know is that TU delft examined it and disproved anything in it at that time.


http://www.southparkstudios.com/episodes/103775/

[Soviet]

I don't think the government did it, but I also don't think it was the planes. As previously mentioned it would defy physics for the planes to bring the building down. I think the terrorists blew the bottom with explosives and used the planes for a distraction to get people out of there and to cause fear.

[Neon]

Ai, who do reckon is more likely to be correct: TU delft, or the testimonials of the people that designed the towers to withstand such planes crashing into them.

I don't think the government did it, but I also don't think it was the planes. As previously mentioned it would defy physics for the planes to bring the building down. I think the terrorists blew the bottom with explosives and used the planes for a distraction to get people out of there and to cause fear.

There too much "evidence", or atleast dodgey areas that make the governments involvenment suspect for me. There is too much information that they withhold or take time over releasing with no explanation why.

[aicaramba]

I believe TU delft obviously, else i would believe in the theory huh?
And i believe the demolishion experts who say that it takes well over a year to plant enough explosives and wire them, to bring down a building of that size.

I think its weird too that they withold so much info, but maybe that is due to public safety (not wanting to give out possible classified info?).

[Neon]

There was much government activity in the towers in the weeks before it's collapse. It said something like "dogs used to search for bombs were unexpectedly removed from the towers". It would have been very easy to plant the bombs. They could have been there for years. You really need to watch the new Loose change

[Nightmare]

I don't know if any of you have heard of this, but modern buildings have explosives pre-built in them.
Not buildings like houses, but towers and facilities already have pre-programmed and calculated explosives inside the support.
Why? To save money and time for demolition crew.

[Soviet]

I somehow doubt they'd put explosives in the World Trade Center with it being a global icon and one of America's largest identifiers.

[JDogg]

I don't know if any of you have heard of this, but modern buildings have explosives pre-built in them.
Not buildings like houses, but towers and facilities already have pre-programmed and calculated explosives inside the support.
Why? To save money and time for demolition crew.

Makes it easier for the terrorists!.

[aicaramba]

WTC wasnt a very modern building was it?
About the explosive dogs not being there, i knew that, you said they had weeks.. Demolishion experts said they needed over a year, not quite the same.

[Neon]

I'm assuming it would take one demolition crew a year. THink how many people they could get to do the job... they could of have more than weeks to do it anyway.

[[SoE]_Zaitsev]

I bet you can indeed do that. Pushing a button ain't hard.

But finding the correct places and amount, and also what kind of explosives, you can't do that