megazor wrote:Highly doubt you have ever been able to climb such trees. Secondly, you might have jumped from 1 m but not from 10.
If I am wrong, you can always video prove it. But you must know, I don't cast doubt on you having a life, only it is most likely different from mine - not so extreme and thrilling, I would say.
Unfortunately I do not own a camera that allows me to film my past, but you may be right. We don't really have those size trees in the middle of London and we don't really have sea either - and jumping into a canal or the Thames is generally not a good idea for a 6 year old, let alone an adult.
If only at 6 years old I knew that there was a specific size of tree to climb for you to actually have a life, is there an exact height you must climb, I wouldn't want to climb a tree only to realise I was 3 foot short of the requirements?
Also, I understand 10m is the required fall distance between platform and water surface but but does it need to be sea water, or does fresh count? Does there need to be a high level of danger involved or does jumping under supervision get considered?
This "having a life" requirements of trees and water is starting to sound like hard work...
Is it not easier to attribute having a life to something less specific - maybe a something physical like organs or something mental like achievements? Would certainly make the world an easier place to live in.
Catch up, go climb a tree somewhere! 
