*grabs his tent*
cya in some years

Moderator: Core Staff
Spiderman and Bond? What kind of game is that? Never heard of it.Drofder2004 wrote:from Spiderman and Bond to Call of Duty.Pedsdude wrote:Good spot.KillerSam wrote:There is no mention of it being CoD6 - just an IW game.
WWI would be no fun. Most of it was trench warfare and the parts that weren't were huge artillery shellings and charging each other across barren scorched lands with bayonets. Doesn't sound very fun imo.steveuk wrote:COD6 being in the future would make a differance, but i realy wished they mad a COD-WW1 version ,with the old type Weapons, Old Type Tanks, ect..COD1 had the fill to WW1 ,well to me it did, but it was WW2 Game,
I like to see many more buildings, larger maps, some with the old Trenches in them, the old style uniforms to.
Im not up to history, i did a search for which countries was in the First world War.
Arabia
Austria-Hungary
Belgium and colonies
Brazil
Bulgaria
China
Costa Rica
Cuba
Czechoslovakia
Estonia
Finland
France and Empire
Great Britain and Empire
Germany and Empire
Greece
Guatemala
Haiti
Honduras
Italy and colonies
so putting some of these in a game would make it more fun, more types of soldiers with there uniforms and weapons,ect
Was watching a war movie the other nite with Mel-gibson, as an Austrial soldier, fighting the Creeks, cant remeber the movie name, but it was good movie. (just noticed Austrial not listed above. Strange??? )
Still i would like to see IW make a WW1 COD game. then make a futuristic Game, ie,, COD7
I hope they make a COD game each year, i would keep playing them untill i get to old to play games, lol 43 is old, but i think i could still play these type of games upuntill i get to tired in playing them or untill i die myself.lol what ever age ya are over the 30+s ya always still have a little kid in yaselfs to play games.
I think they might go as Far as COD-10, but no further than that....
Soviet wrote:lol "most likely something that will rival Halo". The fact that IW is producing it instantly makes it exponentially better than Halo. Basically, Halo sucks. Sounds like they're going the BF2142 approach.
whats the BBC series called, sounds intresting..KillerSam wrote:I am currently part way through a 28part WWI series that the BBC put together in like 1960 or something. Its essentially 28x40minute shows all made from footage from world war I. Its amazing how much cavalry was involved (France sent 100k horses in on one battle alone). Also the death tolls were simply crazy, 180k Allie casualties trying to take a hill.
Halo doesn't suck. You don't like it but the game (Or the series) don't suck. It's too populair to suck.jimbojetuk wrote:Soviet wrote:lol "most likely something that will rival Halo". The fact that IW is producing it instantly makes it exponentially better than Halo. Basically, Halo sucks. Sounds like they're going the BF2142 approach.
I hope they take the 'BF2142' approach and not the 'Halo 3' approach. One halo style game on the market is enough. It would be cool if the pace worked well too, and more players for console! 32 would be ace plzplzplz
matt101harris wrote:big cock was the first thing that came to my head lol
Watch me call it CoD5.helium wrote:CoD: WaW is not CoD5 like everyone keeps saying
matt101harris wrote:big cock was the first thing that came to my head lol
45% of America voted for McCain/Palin. McCain wanted to put fresh veterans out of Iraq into schools as teachers without any preliminary tests to see if they qualified. Palin didn't know Africa was a continenet. What is popular isn't always good.[SoE]_Zaitsev wrote:Halo doesn't suck. You don't like it but the game (Or the series) don't suck. It's too populair to suck.
Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot] and 1 guest